Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "small fixes to make this process more sane. "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes. I like those rules, OP! I’ll add: For application, these 2 questions: -did you use ChatGPT for your application? -did you hire an independent college counselor? -did you SAT/ACT test prep services -remove letter of recommendations Plus: -remove activities from 10 to 6 in CommonApp [b]-increase auditing of Applications due to rampant lying & cheating [/b] [/quote] I'd like to see some of this. Colleges will audit parents financial statements, but not this. What I would propose to colleges: once you'd made your final admit list, audit 10-15% of them. Dartmouth admitted 578 kids. This wouldn't be hard. Audit 100 of them. Dartmouth has a staff that's over 10 people, so what I'm proposing is to spend 1-2 days on this. An hour per app. Just google. Maybe make a couple calls. And if you're finding a lot of information like (example from Who Gets in and Why): "Oh, that young woman we were impressed by who was a certified elephant whisperer [I forget the lingo], that was just something she got on a 6k tour of Thailand. [I know because I recently got an email promoting that teen tour]. Are we still impressed?" And if what you find is you are throwing half these applications back into the WL pile, you need to rethink your process. At this point, I'd email the counselor that there was one application from their school that was initially passed and then failed upon review. Build the reputation of checking this stuff. If you want to be bad ass - and I do - I would admit the 578 pending authorization of data and THEN email 10-15% that their app has been chosen at random for verification. And then rescind when appropriate. I think after a year or two you'd get much more honest data from the students. I dont see this as such a big problem for big state schools, but .. maybe verify 2% after admissions to keep things honest. [/quote] The High School verifies the grades and graduation status. The College Board verifies the SAT score. The College Board verifies the AP scores. The reference letters verify at least some of the claimed activities. Things like Eagle Scout are verified by issuing organizations. You mean like someone whole cloth creates a team sport and photoshops the students picture onto a water polo player? [b]Yeah the schools caught that and people went to prison.[/b] How does the audit work anyway because the number the student provides for the reference is for Vandelay Industries, their friend answers the phone. “Just audit 100 people” is definitely a statement from someone who has never run an audit or regulatory validation process.[/quote] I totally disagree with everything you are saying, but I adore the fact that you think Varsity Blues solved this problem. Like - clap, clap - solved! High five! Also I work in HR and we vet apps all the time. If I had a team of 10 I could vet 100 apps in a day. [/quote] Yes vetting a 17 year old (many of whom don’t even have Photo ID or any employment record whatsoever) is simple. Just call up their friends and family members, none of whom have incentive to lie. Can I see your Credit Report? Don’t have one. I can’t legally sign contracts. Can I talk to your former Boss? Don’t have one. Can I talk to someone who knows you well? Sure here’s my Mom. Someone who knows you well not in your family? Sure here’s my girlfriend. Can I talk to your coach? Sure! (Puts 23 year old cousin on phone) Can I talk to your landlord? Sure here’s my Mom again. Remind me what databases you are finding these CHILDREN in to validate their data. Half the time it’s not even legal to collect any data on them because again they are minors. Can I talk to someone who supervised your charity trip? Yeah; he’s in Pakistan though and only speaks Urdu. [/quote] They can call my sons 2 listed employers though.[/quote] Using the names, locations, and numbers your son provided right? Hi, I’m the wallet inspector please present your wallet for review.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics