Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "So much for "vibrant" --boring apt. building architecture going up right and left on the Avenues"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is it a binary choice? Can't you have more housing that's reasonably attractive? [/quote] Of course you [u]can[/u]. What policies do you want to propose to achieve that goal? Requiring developers to receive approval from the I Like The Looks Of This Building committee, whose membership consists of you?[/quote] it sounds like the membership consists of one or two ANC members? How is that different? Sounds like once a building is approved, we do need a design approval committee with training and background. And not seeded with GGW. These new buildings are really meh. [/quote] One the government can not approve or deny based on aesthetics. Two for every person who likes a design there are two who hate it. [b]If you want vibrant architecture, remove the height limit.[/b][/quote] Chill out, Bob.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
