Reply to Is MCPS biased against boys?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Is MCPS biased against boys?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would be very happy with single sex public school classrooms until 8th grade so the girls can learn more and the boys can be boys, I guess. [/quote]

As a boy parent, I want my kids educated at school and not run wild and do no academics as other parents don't feel their boys are capable.  Ever consider parenting is part of the problem.[/quote]

Never, I sent my kids to an all boys school that had outdoor activities 1st period, then school, then science outside, then reading outside weather permitting, then lunch, recess, then 1 class, sports, math

I never once thought that they thrived in that environment vs the other was a parenting issue. [/quote]

NP. I think you hit the nail on the head. It's not just an MCPS problem. While acknowledging that were are making gender-based generalizations that don't apply to all kids, on balance, boys tend to mature a bit slower than girls and have more trouble with attention and lack of physical movement during the day. A school day that incorporates movement, including daily gym and or recess, is helpful for these boys and better for all students. The problem is that we can't do that outside of private schools. We compound the problem of lack of movement by increasing academic expectations from a young age. Any student who doesn't meet the ideal student standard of labeled as a bad student with bad parents. I have one of those spirited boys (and another who isn't), and I sometimes wonder if my parenting, which was constantly punishing my son and taking away privileges, did more harm than if I had used a more hands-off approach. From the beginning, my kid was a square peg being beaten into a round hole, and he internalized the message that what he was was not enough.  [/quote]

But even you are making negative assumptions about characteristics that are associated with boys… “mature more slowly” “have trouble with attention” etc.

Yes, public schools can provide play-based learning in the younger years, provide more outdoor time for all kids, etc.  As our academic expectations for younger kids have gotten more intense, their levels of achievement have not improved and more kids have been labeled special needs and medicated.  Perhaps we could go back to a time when we saved the more rigorous academics for later years.  Our country seemed to have no problem generating literate and creative people in the 60s and 70s.  In reality, all day kindergarten was implemented to provide day care.  Let’s just make it play-based and be honest.[/quote]

MCPS has had all day K for many years.  Personally I don't like play based and it was a disaster for my kids.  They did much better in more structured, academic preschools and that really prepared them for K.  It hasn't gotten more intense or changed.  What has changed is lax parenting and its easier to have less so parents don't have to be involved.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics