Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Ramaswamy proposes mass federal employee layoffs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I remember chatting with an Under Secretary many years ago. He told me he could eliminate 85% of his staff and it would not impact their work at all. Ouch. [/quote] I’m a career SES and wouldn’t put the number that high, closer to 50%. The problem is I couldn’t choose which ones would go, in a typical RIF those who have been around the longest doing very little would be protected and the ambitious new people would all be canned. I definitely think the government would be better off without 85% of the Under Secretaries I’ve ever worked with. Most have been mildly competent but arrogant and self aggrandizing with zero leadership skills.[/quote] I feel like it's a lot easier to believe that we need fewer political appointees and high level managers than 50% less staff. I mean, I work for a public facing agency, and we already struggle to keep visitor centers open with minimal staffing. Would you like 50% fewer people answering the phones at IRS and Social Security? Just because YOU work with a lot of useless people doesn't mean the people who get paid a lot less are less needed. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics