Reply to Is CogAT gone forever?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Is CogAT gone forever?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is COGAT going to be required for any other gradess this year?[/quote]

These gatekeeping tests have fallen out of favor since they are inequitable. [/quote]

I don’t really see how the Cogat is inequitable. It’s not based on concepts taught. Vast majority of kids have never seen it before/prepped in any way. It measures cognitive aptitude and reasoning skills. It’s actually a much better tool than the MAP, which in my opinion is a good test but could be seen as inequitable since scores can be improved based on early access to more advanced concepts. [/quote]

True. The majority have never seen it or prepped.

But those that had seen it and prepped were getting a lot of admissions.  [/quote]

With just a few tutoring sessions to practice this test my kid's score improved by 20%. It only cost me a few hundred bucks. [/quote]

I would say something, but will wait so see the results in a few years so that no one will argue with how badly MCPS messed up the GT program and magnet feeders.

Suffice to say that when MCPS threw out the CoGAT (a race-neutral, nationally-administered test), I believe they were no longer selecting the best-of-the-best anymore.  Thankfully there were a lot of private companies willing to pick up that slack.  The parents and students that realized this have a distinct advantage over those that didn't.

There were already signs when (I believe it was Frost?) beat TPMS in math competitions?  Let's see how HS turns out for those kids.[/quote]

Ok, let me repeat this as I have many times in other threads because you don’t seem to be able to get this straight: LAST YEAR’S 8th GRADERS WERE SELECTED USING COGAT. I don’t know when Frost allegedly beat TPMS in math competitions but it certainly wasn’t this year and any year prior to this year some or all of the students were selected using COGAT.

High school is turning out pretty well for my kid who was selected for TPMS using COGAT and is in the Blair magnet. I expect it will also turn out pretty well for their sibling who was selected for the TPMS magnet using the lottery.[/quote]

That's not true.

Last year's 8th Graders within the TPMS magnet program were selected in their 5th grade using "MCPS Percentile."[/quote]

YES IT IS TRUE!! FFS! I am the parent of one of those 8th graders and they took the Cogat in fall 2019 (pretty sure it was November, results came out in January) and it was used for the selection into the magnet program for the 2020-2021 year. I have the paperwork for Cogat results and the offer of a place. My kid’s Cogat scores were all 99th percentile both locally and nationally. Fall 2019 was the last time that Cogat was used for entry to the middle school magnets.

Please stop lying and spreading misinformation. If you don’t know fine, but some of us do and there is no wiggle room or space for interpretation here. It’s fact that Cogat was used in 2019 for the 2020-2021 school year.[/quote]

So, everyone is a little bit correct. You have to go back in time to understand this debate. This year's 11th graders are the first class that went through "universal selection," which dropped the "opt in" testing that happened on a Saturday, and dropped the separate STEM and Humanities tests. It also dropped the at-home essay and introduced locally normed scores. So, the takeaway was that the top kids from each "tier" were being selected but anecdotal data suggests that those kids were all still above about the 95th percentile nationally.

When MCPS made this change, they ALSO promised that the kids who were identified as "highly able" but were not admitted under the new system would be offered an equivalent education at their home schools with a "peer cohort." That's the year they rolled out HIGH and AIM. Now, implementation of those classes was spotty, with some schools not offering them at all, and others offering them to everyone.

So, that's this year's 11th graders. That's also the cohort in which Frost beat TPMS at a math competition once and Frost parents haven't stopped talking about it since. To me, the Frost victory was proof that the system was working - highly able kids were still excelling at their home school. We can now see that those kids did well in high school admissions as well. This year's 9th, 10th, and 11th graders all seem to have landed well even though they came in after universal screening.

That system held up through this year's 8th graders, when MCPS switched to a lottery for a locally normed top 85%. It should be noted that the lottery came about partially as a result of a lawsuit filed by some Potomac parents. They were so worked up about universal screening that they filed a suit that led directly to the new system.

Basically, as a parent with kids who have gone through all three iterations of this process, I think the "middle" option was best but people lost their everloving minds over that one so now we have a much worse system with the bar set far too low. [/quote]

Nice explanation, but the discussion was about whether Cogat was used or not. There is no “little bit correct”. The poster who claimed Cogat was not used was wrong and the poster who said it was used was correct.[/quote]

DP.  CogAT was used through this year's 9th graders, who were identified during the 2019-20 school year from data gathered prior to the CovID shutdown.  This year's 8th graders were identified with an any-of-a-few heuristic, using MAP because they couldn't administer CogAT in the remote setting across the huge numbers at MCPS.  This year's 7th graders were identified with a strict (though FARMS-rate locally normed) cutoff for the fall MAP of their 5th-grade year with additional requirements (grades, etc., employed in a this-AND-that paradigm, not any-of-a-few or sliding-scale).  This year's 6th graders were identified similarly, but the local norming was much stricter, as pandemic recovery showed highly differentially between high-FARMS (scores remained more depressed vs. national norms) and low-FARMS (closer to pre-pandemic performance, with lots of high scorers) -- this meant a higher score was needed from a low-FARMS school to get in to the lottery for this year's 6th grade class than it had been from a prior year.

MCPS still will not provide all of the detail.[/quote]

I’m not sure why you stated this as if you were saying something different. The issue was that Cogat was used for this years 9th graders (last years 8th) and you are saying the same thing, which is correct. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics