Reply to Wedding offenses: rank according to badness

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Wedding offenses: rank according to badness"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]No-kids weddings - fine as long as you let everyone know well in advance and you anticipate a higher than average level of declines from people who don’t want to travel without their kids.

No +1 weddings - absolutely no, if a person is in a relationship they need to be able to bring their s/o and it’s polite to give the option for a date to single guests as well.

Destination weddings - fine, again, as long as you don’t pout and get mad about people who decline because they don’t want to travel to your destination.

Dry weddings - if you absolutely must at least have it during the morning/day so my whole afternoon and evening isn’t taken up by your dry wedding. But it really just makes you look cheap. Even if there is a religious or health or cultural reason for it, it still comes across as cheap to have a totally dry wedding.

No open bar weddings - seems about the same as dry weddings, kind of cheap but can be ok for something like a brunch/day time wedding when you provide wine at the tables.

Weddings of couples who ask for cash - kind of tacky but meh, everyone is tacky these days. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics