Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Why does DCPS rank 49th in the country, behind poor states like Kentucky, Tennessee and WV?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It was fairly shocked to see just how much time and resources at our majority minority school are devoted to “anti racism” curriculum. I mean, 90% of the kids are well below grade level. Shouldn’t every minute of every day be spent on math/reading? It’s bizarre. [/quote] My kids attend a DCPS Title 1 school and spend zero hours/time on anti-racism curriculum. You’re a troll.[/quote] NP. You are naive and obviously don’t know what your kid is learning. Anti-racism is definitely embedded in the curriculum, no doubt. Also as you get to higher grades in middle and high school, it tends to dominate.[/quote] You might be surprised to learn that anti-racism efforts are more robust in Ward 3 schools than anywhere else in the city. Yes, anti-racism is embedded in the curriculum, however it's not explicitly taught as a learning standard. While you might have learned 30 years ago the white supremacy perspective on slavery, current curriculum takes a more holistic approach without leaving out the voices and experiences of those who were enslaved. See how fast we can get to an anti-racism lesson without saying "Today's learning objective will be that all students will be able to define anti-racism." In many schools in Ward 3 Black History month is celebrated with much more effort than many other schools. Why do you suppose that might be?[/quote] Please tell me the "White Supremacist version of history" that was taught in DC. [/quote] Not "White Supremacist version of history" rather perspective on slavery, as an example. Any historical textbook that didn't include the perspective and/or experiences of an enslaved person, or Native American is by definition bias. Any lesson, for that matter. Consider Christopher Columbus in a more comprehensive historical context and the comparison of curriculum 50 years to those used in classroom nows. Find me a textbook from 1970 that is inclusive to all voices on the subject of Christopher Columbus and him finding America.[/quote] You'd have to go pretty far back to find a textbook that didn't include the perspective of slaves and indigenous people. It may not have been gotten its full share of coverage, but it was there. I went to public elementary school in the Deep South in the 1970s, and I certainly learned that slavery was miserable for the slaves and that indigenous people were treated badly.[/quote] Maybe. I went to public elementary school in the midwest in the 1970s and distinctly remember being confused by the concept of ownership of another human being and the illustrations in textbooks of enslaved people with happy smiles while in the cotton fields. [/quote] I went to Catholic school in the deep South in the 90s and I also feel confused by the entire debate about what should be taught about slavery, native Americans and generally American history. I remember learning about the horrors of slavery and abuse of Native Americans. It was not glossed over. We learned about the Trail of Tears, etc. Did other people really not learn this stuff? Was our curriculum really that different bc it wasn’t a public school? Maybe studying social sciences in college makes me take for granted that other people’s education on these subjects may have not have continued to fill out in university education? [/quote] No, we all had similar educations. But we also learned that Washington and Jefferson were great men, thinkers and wise designers. Kids don't learn that today. Now, all they are are white slaveowners. We would have been better off as a country if they hadn't existed. [/quote] You lost the plot. Now children are able to learn that while they did some great things they also did harm as well and that harm is something we should be aware of.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics