Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Thanks SC - we can look forward to the Potomac River Turing orange again now "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Question for the anti-environmentalists here: if in say 10 years it’s clear this ruling has led to further destruction of fragile ecosystems and more polluted waterways, etc, will you shrug your shoulders and say oh well, too bad, not my problem? Truly curious if you just don’t care about nature or you think that more pollution is ok to accept in order to ward off what you perceive as over regulation. [/quote] I would expect the legislative and executive branches to fix the problem in a constitutionally permissible way. Failing that, I’ll vote for the people that would fix the problem. And the states have nearly unlimited authority to protect the environment within their jurisdictions. [/quote] The problem with giving states all the control is that if your state is downstream from a state that doesn't care about water quality, you're out of luck. Waterways and wetlands do not know about or care about man-made borders, they only follow the laws of physics and fluid dynamics. That's why it makes more sense for this to be regulated at a federal level.[/quote] Not as big of an issue as you would think. With notable exceptions, the states tend to get redder as you flow down the watershed. It can still be regulated federally. [/quote] It’s not just about differences between states, though. It’s driven by a few greedy interest groups that have outsized influence in almost every state. This is something that has been pushed by commercial and real estate developers and agriculture interests to allow them to fill and develop wetlands, allow more polluted runoff in them, etc. as if all that doesn’t eventually make it into navigable waterways and public water supplies. A natural savannah that serves as a big sponge holding stormwater so it doesn’t all immediately flow into a river or bay is a great benefit to any watershed for flood control and water quality. These a**holes want to develop them and pollute them and that will increase flood risk and pollution throughout the watersheds. Even blue states are suckers for developers and agribusinesses. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics