Reply to Omnibus Corrupt SCOTUS Thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Omnibus Corrupt SCOTUS Thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I guess Garland won't act until something horrible happens.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/JCNSeverino/status/1654455075035643914[/twitter][/quote]

Oh if they enforced the laws many many conservatives would be imprisoned. The documented list of conservatives threatening, death threats and harassing including DAs, judges, reporters, election workers, etc and their families including little kids is too long to go over.

There is a difference between protesting vs what republicans do.[/quote]

Anyone making threats should be arrested. 
Protesting in front of the Justices' homes is illegal.  
Merrick Garland twiddles his thumbs.  [/quote]

If they are in public space and not blocking driveways or walkways, then it isn't illegal.[/quote]

The WaPo disagrees as do numerous experts. 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/11/protest-justice-home-illegal/

Title 18, Section 1507 of the U.S. Code, which was enacted in 1950. Under this law, it is illegal to picket or parade in front of a courthouse or a judge’s home "with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge."[/quote]

[b]And they don’t have that intent[/b].  Note the same law applies to the Supreme Court so I guess everyone who protests there should also be arrested, including all the right wing groups?[/quote]

How can you claim this?  How do you know?  Were you one of the losers marching in front of their homes?[/quote]

The law works the other way around.  Prosecutors have to prove they do have that intent.  If we don’t know, the prosecution loses.[/quote]

And, since Garland's DOJ has not even charged anyone, we don't know their intent. 
We know that the intent of at least one nutcase was to assassinate one of the justices.  [/quote]

You don't charge people to figure out what their intent is.  That would be very illegal.  Do you think all these people should be charged too?  They are protesting in front of the supreme court, which violates 18 USC 1507 as you interpret it.

[img]https://apnews.com/article/health-texas-mississippi-constitutions-281018c3cd29f79d02444a539bc16d63/gallery/512edb91acf94323857bb15256098c6e[/img][/quote]

The signs they are carrying tell us their intent.

[img]https://c.files.bbci.co.uk/17C5F/production/_124657379_alito.jpg[/img]

[img]https://imagez.tmz.com/image/fa/4by3/2022/06/19/fa25de70e83a4c46b43ae756bf1cc07f_md.jpg[/img][/quote]
John Roberts can shove it up his sidewalk counseling bum. If everyday random women can be accosted by limp old men spittling misogyny at them, then the religious tribunal can shut up and tolerate some respectful and quiet protesting. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics