Reply to Religious people who have affairs

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Religious people who have affairs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Overall, Democrats, adults who didn't grow up in intact families, and those who rarely or never attend religious services are more likely than others to have cheated on their spouse.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america[/quote]

According to Sourcewatch, the group that  pp links to: The Institute for Family Studies (IFS) ..."is a conservative "think tank" which, according to its website, has the expressed mission "to strengthen marriage and natural family and advancing the well-being of children through research and public education."[1] Research from IFS and its employees are frequently cited and published in both conservative outlets such as National Review [2] and more mainstream ones, like the Washington Post.[3]. "IFS is a successor to the Ridge Foundation, through which Bradley and others used to support Wilcox's National Marriage Project."[1] The Institute for Family Studies says that its "commitment is rooted in the social-science fact that children are most likely to thrive when they are raised by their own married biological parents. The underlying premise of its work is that families and communities, freedom and prosperity, and the political order itself -- both at home and abroad -- are all critically dependent upon the existence of a strong healthy, pervasive marriage culture among the citizenry."[4]

IFS is also an associate member of the State Policy Network (SPN), a web of state pressure groups that denote themselves as "think tanks" and drive a right-wing agenda in statehouses nationwide." https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Institute_for_Family_Studies

[/quote]

oddly you don’t seem to care pp posted lots and lots of statements about religious people, child porn, adultery, etc, without one source to back up any of their statements. Why not? If the source quoted by many many many mainstream news organizations isn’t good enough for you personally- why don’t you take pp to task for posting unsourced and unverifiable statements?
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics