Reply to Less Selective College but the right fit?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Less Selective College but the right fit?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]College rankings aren't about bragging rights but about more resources, a more capable student body, and greater post graduate prospects.

I don't think it's a reasonable decision to set all that aside - and i think the concept of "fit" is exaggerated (many colleges can fit, and "the right fit" can sometimes be just a euphemism for avoiding character-building challenges.  Let's be realistic:   none of these schools are like boot camp).    I frankly don't understand why the other ("more selective") school that your kid liked well enough to apply to three months ago suddenly isn't a good "fit."   How reliable are 17 year olds' understanding of what they're going to want from college over four years (and whether these colleges would or wouldn't be able to provide it -- unless you're choosing between West Point and Oberlin, many of these student bodies have similar subsets of students anyway)?   If your kid thought the 'more selective' school was a potentially good fit when applying three months ago and doesn't now, how do you both know their mind won't change again in another three or six months?   Are the reasons for their cooling on the more competitive school legitimate (eg, your kid visted a rural SLAC and realized they won't be able to survive for years in an environment like that...), or are they unwarranted (eg, insecurity about how they'll perform -- despite being admitted?) or secondary (eg proximity to restaurants and shopping?   Dislike of gothic architecture?   Not liking someone who went there from their high school?)

You want to be supportive and that's great, but I think you and your kid should have a pretty open, specific discussion about why they want to spend four years (and $) at a school that is judged as offering a not as strong education.   This may be a situation where it's a well-considered and understandable choice, but it may also be just a bout of adolescent anxiety and the best support you can offer is to steer them to the stronger option.

I know it's sort of expected here on DCUM to say "everything your Blessed Precious wants is legitimate and should be supported by you" -- but sometimes it actually isn't.  And i also think sometimes there's too much "you're all winners" pressure here to dismiss or denigrate the college rankings, which shouldn't be slavishly followed (and minor distinctions probably don't mean much), but in the main are actually pretty thoughtful efforts to measure the quality of the educational experience each college provides.

Btw, you use the term 'less selective" in your title.   I'm talking about rankings (ie academic quality).   Not "selectivity" of admissions, which isn't always a reliable predictor of educational quality.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics