Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Glenn Youngkin's Policies cost schools across VA $202 Million"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s a bummer but it will be spread across the entire state and the FCPS budget alone is $3.5 billion. And perhaps the need for cuts will fall attention to some of the unnecessary fat in FCPS, which wastes tons of money on central administration and third-party “equity” consultants who serve no useful purpose other than to allow School board members to claim they care about equity when in fact you have members like Tholen and Corbett Sanders who’ve spent their entire time in office protecting their own wealthier neighborhoods. [/quote] Still criticizing FCPS for a mistake by Richmond...[/quote] +1 I love the word "bummer" as if it's this is some accident rather than basic governing incompetence by people. Why were there not more checks in place on something as basic as allocating budgets? This is not a disagreement about policies where you say one is bloated or whatever--it's basic, basic accounting at the STATE level. State budgets are something that gets checked all the way up the ladder, so SO many people had to not be good at their jobs for this to happen. Anyway, if you noticed, many posters note that this hurts the rural schools a lot more--1) because they've built their planning on what Youngkin told them they could and now have to spend again on re-planning but with less money -- planning is expensive--you need accountants/budget analysts etc. 2) their margins are much smaller because they have fewer students, 3) The amount lost by the NoVA districts impacts these districts twice because NoVA subsidizes the rest of the state--so they are double hit --they have their own lower recalcuated budget, and then the recalculation of the NoVA subsidy that adds to their lower budget Rural districts were already hurting because their school age population is really spread out and declining and schools are funded on a per pupil basis--this is just really bad for them. [/quote] The Democrats representing Fairfax have complained about NoVa subsidizing RoVa for decades. Fake concern. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics