Reply to Can a kid who is not an URM, or recruited athlete or legacy get into an Ivy from a DC private?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Can a kid who is not an URM, or recruited athlete or legacy get into an Ivy from a DC private?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]37% of Harvard’s Class of 2025 went to private school. 20% were legacies. I don’t believe every legacy went to private school, which means at the very least 17% of the class was non-legacy private — though it’s almost certainly more.

Only 10% of US seniors go to private school.

The reality is that private schools continue to overrepresent at these schools and it’s not just legacies/hooked kids.

https://features.thecrimson.com/2021/freshman-survey/makeup-narrative/[/quote]

This does not disprove OP's and PP's point. "Private" is not a proxy for unhooked stats kids of course. Private schools recruit/admit URMs and athletes with similar fervor as the colleges.[/quote]

So are you positing that all or most of the private school kids getting in are hooked, at a higher rate than public school kids? [/quote]

No. No one has said that there are zero unhooked private school kids getting into ivies. But the continued overrepresentation of privates at ivies is being used by some posters to prove that little or nothing has changed. So, what I'm positing is the point that has also been made upthread: top privates have already been recruiting/admitting hooked candidates at 9th (and even 7th in my experience) and it's at least in part to adjust to the new reality in college admissions. [/quote]

They’ve always recruited that way. Do you have data to show they’ve changed how they recruit?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics