Reply to Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House. [/quote]
Link?[/quote]

WaPo and other papers.[/quote]
Please link to where “WaPo and other papers” reported that “the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.” [/quote]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/investigators-see-ego-not-money-as-trump-s-motive-on-classified-papers/ar-AA146LqQ[/quote]

That doesn’t say what you say it claims.  That is an anonymously sourced opinion from someone (likely in the trump camp) who claims to know what prosecutors believe about his motivation for stealing classified documents.  Do we have to spell everything out for you? The FBI didn’t make any public announcements.[/quote]

I think you’ll find that the whole “Trump sold secrets” narrative is just that. They have the papers and they would have charged him. A special counsel would not be needed. But go ahead and hope.[/quote]

A special counsel is actually more likely to be needed when the evidence supports charging. Garland doesn’t want to do it himself. Let a neutral third party do it. I’m not surprised you can’t figure that out though, based on your general lack of reading comprehension, it’s hopeless.[/quote]

Or when you want to state “I can’t comment on an ongoing investigation” when you are called to testify.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics