Reply to Sullivan — deliberately misleading

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Sullivan — deliberately misleading"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Who cares? He doesn't have a chance of winning[/quote]

People who value honesty and transparency. It matters because it sets precedents for deliberately misleading campaign materials. Whether or not he — or any one particular candidate — has a chance of winning isn’t the most critical issue here.

[/quote]

I agree with you. Which is why I hope you are as equally, or more, upset with [b]the Maryland democratic committee that created ads on behalf of Dan Cox, when he was running against Kelly Schultz in the primary. 
[/b]
Its pure manipulation by the left.

And it really pisses me off, because it works. I cannot vote for Dan Cox. But I would’ve voted for Kelly. It was incredibly dishonest by the Democrats.[/quote]

You mean the ad from the DGA with the tag line "Dan Cox: Too close to Trump, too conservative for Maryland" [/quote]

There was certain manipulation/strategic political shenanigans.

“David Turner, a spokesman for the D.G.A., said his organization was focused on “winning these elections in November.” If giving a boost to far-right candidates increases the chances that Democrats will prevail, he said, it is worth the risk of placing in a governor’s mansion someone like Mr. Cox”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/07/20/us/primary-elections-midterms

The entire article is worth reading. Dan Cox also scrubbed his Q anon and far right conspiracy theories from his social media. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics