Reply to DHS collaborating with FB and Twitter to censor information

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "DHS collaborating with FB and Twitter to censor information"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is the definition of fascism, a term that gets misused often on here. Government working hand in glove with large corporations to stifle dissent is the text book definition of fascism.[/quote]

You've got the definition right but the application wrong.  "Dissent" is a keyword here.  Disinformation and fake news including foreign fake news is not dissent or honest discourse.  [/quote]

Any tool can be abused. Some tools should not exist due to their potential for abuse. Would you want the [b]Trump administration to be able to censor "disinformation?"[/b][/quote]

This story is about them doing it...[/quote]

Stop being daft. The stories they were trying to stop from coming out, specifically the lab leak theory and other takes on Covid that have now been proven to be either correct or have merit (like vaccines not stopping transmission), was not an agenda being pushed by Trump. You are either are against fascism - that is, the collusion between government and big corporations to stifle opposition and free speech - or you are for it. Seems like they’re a lot of fascists in this thread that like to larp as anti fascist because they don’t like Trump.[/quote]

The vaccines developed while the Wuhan strain was raging across the world were highly effective in stopping the transmission of the Wuhan strain. [/quote]

However, COVID quickly mutated making the vaccines far less effective. It's nuanced. You can't just write "The vaccine is effective" and shut down anyone challenging that statement. [/quote]

Compare our response to countries that used non-mRNA vaccines.

You really want to be right. But you're not being objective.[/quote]

Neither are you. If you compare our response, the vaccine was ineffective at controlling spread in the population.[/quote]

In fact, Pfizer knew that. It’s in their paperwork[/quote]

Can you point us to that?[/quote]

I can quote the fact check spin on it:

"It’s true that Pfizer didn’t know whether its COVID-19 vaccine stopped transmission before it was available to the public. But this wasn’t the primary goal of the vaccine, nor was it a requirement for authorization in the U.S. or Europe."

So they told us it would stop the spread and Pfizer didn't know if that was the case. Neither did our own FDA or CDC as a result

"About 15:23 into the video, Roos asks, “Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee?”

Small answers the question at 15:31:45 into the video, saying, “No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”
"[/quote]

We don’t “know” the validity of the theory of gravity so go jump out a window and show us how smart you are? Stupid people who have no education to even interpret simple statements should just go watch tv and let the thoughtful people discuss things accurately.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics