Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Duke, Northwestern, other Ivies What Does It Take ?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Williams and Amherst have single digit admissions rates. The rates you cite can only possibly by ED and if so, as a PP said, are very skewed by atheltes which they probably recruit in the same raw numbers as ivies but the colleges themselves are much smaller. At my kids’ mcps high school, many more students were admitted to Cornell than either of these. In the world of kids I know, the ones who were admitted to H/Y/P were true superstars. Not just perfect gpa, perfect sat and the most rigorous classes (and when I say most rigorous, I really mean it - not just thru MV but also took all of the english and social studies APs, took multiple hard science APs, and finished world language AP junior year). But also excelled in other things - music, science competitions, quizbowl or debate. These were the 2-3 kids in a class of 500 who you “knew” would one day go to H/Y/P. There are of course other students every year who get into Penn,Columbia, Dartmouth - these kids are also terrific students but don’t have that “extra” and so there are a lot more of them so it actually seems less predictable to me why Lola got into Penn and Larla did not. And again, I think from our HS the students have an easier time getting into Penn and Dartmouth than Williams and Amherst where the 1-2 admits are usually sports recruits (and terrific students). [/quote] My answer expands on this but generally tracks. Top 10 schools are for the very top kids at a high school. Truly, top 3-5 in class (not 5%), above 1550 test scores, major leadership (President of class, captain of championship winning team sort of stuff). They will likely get rejected to some places too but I have seen most of those kids get into 1 top 10 school that is considered the long shot - particularly if they can apply SCEA/ED. I think where DCUM gets confused is many of us have a kid who is awesome but not quite that level: maybe 1550 SAT and near perfect grades but only top 10 kids in class. Maybe President if a smaller club. And, that kid is awesome but there are so many out there like that. I have one of these. He is not going to get into an Ivy (maybe he would have in my generation, but that is not relevant) and he is not sad about it. He knows he is accomplished but there are more qualified candidates. He has found a few schools beyond the top 20 he would be excited to attend. They are tremendous colleges. We can all believe our kids are great and worked hard but rationally understand they are not worthy of a spot where only 6/100 kids get in. And be proud of them and excited for college! [/quote] I am sure Northwestern is a good school, but the students from our private DC high school who apply and get in NU are not the top students in the grade. Probably top 25-30% [/quote] Which private DC high school ? I find this hard to believe. Northwestern University reports that slightly over 95% of matriculated (Fall 2020 entering class) students who graduated high school in 2020 were in the Top 10% of their HS class. For a relative comparison, US News reports the percentage of Fall 2020 entering class who graduated in the top 10% of their high school class: Princeton 89% Columbia 96% (but not sure if this was part of the fraudulent date submitted by Columbia to US News) Harvard 94% MIT 100% Yale 94% Stanford 96% [b]U Chicago 99%[/b] U Penn 96% CalTech 96% Duke 95% Johns Hopkins 99% Northwestern 95% Dartmouth College 93% Brown 95% Vanderbilt 90% WashUStL 86% Cornell 84% Rice 92% Notre Dame 90% Emory 83% Georgetown 83% Michigan 77% Carnegie Mellon 89% U Virginia 90% NYU 82% Tufts 84% UNC-Chapel Hill 74% Wake Forest 73% Boston College 79% Georgia Tech 88% William & Mary 77% Boston University 66% Tulane 63% SLACs: Williams 95% Amherst 855 Swarthmore 93% Pomona 90% Wellesley 85% Bowdoin 84% Claremont McKenna 73% Carleton College 70% Middlebury 80% Wash & Lee 80% Davidson 76% Grinnell 72% Hamilton 86% Haverford 94% Barnard 90% Colby 74% Colgate 65% Wesleyan 67% U Richmond 50% Vassar 73% Bates College 60% Colorado College 73% Macalester 66% Kenyon 55% Bucknell 54% Skidmore 33% Furman 44% [/quote] I don't know how this could possibly be true. Chicago is a typical destination for DC private school kids who are more like the top 20-30%. The very top (top 10%) go to the Ivy league. Is the entire 1% at Chicago that is outside the 10% from DC? [/quote] WOW ! If you believe this, then you need to do some simple basic research and stop posting misinformation.[/quote] Dude. St. Albans 2022 sent 14 kids to Chicago from a class of 75. By definition, 7 kids were outside of the top 10%. Plus the school sent 20 kids to the Ivy League and most of these were academically above the 14 who went to Chicago. So the Chicago admits were primarily in the 60-90% percentile of the class. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics