Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Widening 355 in MoCo"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As long as we get interchanges on 355 from the exit at the Beltway up through Urbana.[/quote] Again, what will happen to the thousands of businesses and residences that currently line this roadway?[/quote] I don't care. I just want a limited access highway from the Beltway up to Urbana.[/quote] Trolls going to troll, I guess. 270 and 355 are critically important pieces of road infrastructure for the county. At minimum it should not be controversial to widen 270 and also maintain the current number of 355 travel lanes. If you actually cared about the residents and businesses, that is. [/quote] It is controversial because widening the road is a waste of money and doesn't address the problem.[/quote] What do you think the problem is?[/quote] Too many people dependent on single occupancy vehicles. Maryland needs to invest in serious mass transit to connect Frederick to DC; Columbia to DC and the intermediate areas like Silver Spring, Bethesda, Rockville etc. Building more roads leads to having more cars sitting in the traffic they create. If the goal is to move people, then build infrastructure that does that.[/quote] Most people, such as yourself, who say ‘build more public transportation’ are the ones who would stay in their cars and never use it. They just want to get the poors off the road so they can have it to themselves. [/quote] Nope, I live in DC and seldom use 270 for anything. But induced demand is a thing, and 270 is a textbook case. Try something else, because adding more lanes simply doesn't solve the problem.[/quote] Quick question smart guy. What was the AADT before and after adding lanes to 270?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics