Reply to These NYTimes blueberry muffins are so simple, so cheap, and OMG good. Seriously, make them

Forum Index » Food, Cooking, and Restaurants

Reply to "These NYTimes blueberry muffins are so simple, so cheap, and OMG good. Seriously, make them"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We made them.  I thought they were pretty gross.  Too sugary.  It really affirms for me that the NYT Cooking section is pretty bad and that someone is trying very hard to use DCUM to advertise the NYT.  Shame on them.[/quote]

I agree that the recipes are bad/mediocre. I don't know if these posts are from an influencer. I think a lot of people don't cook much and they offer simple recipes and people think it being the nytimes gives it authority wrt cooking it doesn't deserve. Rachel Ray's recipes are better. I do rate nytimes recipes ahead of the pioneer woman. I'm a big fan of Ina Garten and think most of her recipes are basic but at least turn out well.[/quote]

Everyone has different taste. I have a friend who for years raved about her pumpkin muffins. When I finally got a chance to taste them, I almost got them out. Turns out her recipe was a can of Libby's pumpkin pie mix plus some sweetened condensed milk blended into a yellow cake mix! So sickeningly sweet and weirdly dense.

Haven't made these blueberry muffins (looks like way too much sugar) but I do like the chicken shwarma.[/quote]

That sounds disgusting.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics