Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "What really IS the point of AAP? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I posted previously, but I think there is a unnecessary forced scarcity to this program. There are more deserving kids than there are slots, which sends parents into a tizzy. Level III should be expanded and made more substantive -- something that would take the pressure off of Level IV. Level II is a joke and something most teachers try to do anyway. [/quote] I agree but this won't happen county-wide because it's too close to tracking. It would make a lot of sense to move all kids around to different classrooms for core subjects based on ability at the elementary level but there would be a ton of pushback. [/quote] I understand that grouping kids based on ability isn't the current education norm, but that doesn't mean it doesn't work if done right (challenging work for all, make sure kids continue to push forward on all levels, etc). Again, we're just asking too much of teachers too. If you have kids below grade level, at grade level, above and way above... they will teach to below and at grade level. Kids above grade level are ignored and thus why people go nuts about AAP. [/quote] Tracking is often permanent because it's hard to catch when you fall behind progressively more every year by design and when deciding on how to group in following years the status quo almost always wins. All you do is put the pressure of getting into AAP on whatever year tracking is decided and move it from the central committee to the principal [/quote] I'm asking this seriously and not to be argumentative -- Let's remove AAP level IV from the equation for a moment. Couldn't you use the SOLs and plethora of other testing to move groups around to have an actual robust level II and level III program? Theoretically, those programs are some level of "tracking." You say they fall behind more progressively, but isn't this an opportunity to focus on those students and make sure they are all having their needs met to reach goals and targets. In our sports crazed country, we would never look at a group of fast runners or swimmers and tell them to slow down so others could catch up. We may get additional coaching/training for the slower group, find the race or style that works best for that athlete, but we wouldn't slow everyone down. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics