Reply to Britney Spears pregnant with 3rd child

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Britney Spears pregnant with 3rd child"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel sorry for the poster above who has gone down a bunny hole of conspiracy theories.

Britney Spears originally VOLUNTARILY entered into the conservatorship, and while she wanted her speeches about her father and criticizing the terms of her conservatorship public, she consistently asked the court to mask her actual diagnosis and treatment record from public view. This is not just because she has an affinity for HIPAA, but because she doesn’t want the #freebritney people to know just how mentally ill she is.

I fear we are about to see her meltdown again as she’s already exhibited in recent social media how manic she is much of the time, and pregnancy and post partum are likely to really knock her hormones and moods out of the park.

I don’t wish her ill, but I do think people with major mental illness that is highly heritable should think twice and three, four, five, etc. times about bringing a child into this world, no matter how much money they have to support them. Major mental illness can be very hellish to endure, even with lots of wealth to cushion the pain. I wish she’d considered focusing on her mental health but I’m sure the fiancé wanted the lock on two decades of support. [/quote]

She agreed to it because her family threatened to take away her kids otherwise. I feel sad for how many women think their family and the courts will protect you. [/quote]

I’m a former family law attorney and a former prosecutor who handled child removal cases AND involuntary commitment proceedings.

Britney’s parents did not have the power to take her kids away from her absent her having a serious, debilitating mental illness. Britney had plenty of money to hire skilled attorneys when all this first happened back in the day. So she is either a total idiot, which her fans insist she is not, or she is in fact seriously mentally ill. Yes sometimes conservatorships are abused and/or are abusive, but that fact doesn’t equate to Britney’s being either. The court scrutinized her conservatorship regularly and she NEVER ASKED FOR IT TO BE REMOVED. Is that because she’s an idiot? Or because she was to busy being seriously mentally ill to make effective arguments that she should be let loose on the world without any guidance and/or requirement for mental health treatment?

We will all see, I have no doubt, what the answer turns out to be. Thus far since being ‘freed’ from her conservatorship, Britney’s public actions re: social media haven’t been the best evidence of a stable mind. In her objections to her conservatorship she railed against the requirements that she attend regular therapy, so one can only assume she’s quit that since she was ‘set free.’ Let’s see how she manages pregnancy and post partum without benefit of a therapeutic relationship with a mental health provider. Maybe it will all go swimmingly - I certainly don’t wish her to fail, as that just means another baby struggling with a mother who doesn’t fully participate in bonding which will only exacerbate the genetic tendency the baby will have for developing mental illness itself. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics