Reply to Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

This is absolutely fascinating.

Reading the exchange of texts between Ginni Thomas and Mark Meadows (see WaPo): I strongly suspect that Meadows lives in the real world and knows there was no election fraud, but is willing to enable the insurrection as long as there's political benefit to him. He's corrupt but not blind. And that Thomas, however, is completely crazy and really believes this stuff, as well as QAnon conspiracy theories. He's trying to fend her off with short texts of thanks, but comes off as distinctly less sincere and gun-ho about the entire concept of election fraud.

[/quote]

+1. I am just appalled by the situation, particularly the fact that the justice did not recuse himself and that his wife was so actively involved in the plot to change the election's result while her husband is on the SC. but most surprising for me, I always thought that these prominent people like G. Thomas, but also gen. Flynn, were right wing POS ready to do and say anything and everything to keep power to their side, but that at the same time they know Q lies are lies and so on. Basically, they are rational people with no morals who spread conspiracies and lies to the dumb masses for their advantage. Instead, both in the case of G. Thomas and gen Flynn, it looks like they really believe what they say, in other words they are truly nutjobs.  [/quote]
It’s like a perversion of the Manchurian Candidate (or what I remember of it; it’s been a minute since I saw the 1962 one and I never read the book). [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics