Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "republican war on contraception"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=TheManWithAUsername][quote=Anonymous]But maybe the poster isn't picking on impotence. Maybe she believes we should not spend money on treating older people. We could draw the line at menopause. Breeding is done, let nature take its course from there on. We'll start with saving money on thyroid, estrogen, progesterone, and don't worry so much about bone density. Arthritis, hip replacements, stents, alzheimers research, there's a fortune to be saved if we assume that we can let ourselves go after having kids.[/quote] She (I'm assuming) seems pretty supportive of nature in general. We'd have to crunch the numbers, but I bet we could save a bundle if we stopped treating al[b]l naturally occurring diseases.[/b] Either that or she thinks it impossible for a younger man to be impotent. Hmm...or I guess doctors could just determine case-by-case which men are too old to have sex.[/quote] Aren't all diseases naturally ocurring? Just like pregnancy is naturally occurring. Impotence is naturally occurring. Whether it's a good thing or a bad thing depends on the perception of the person experiencing the condition. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics