Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Crime on the hill - Charles Allen has got to go "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This country is strange. Half of the populace is willfully obtuse to the dangers of guns in the face of terrible rates of death. Just look at the murder statistics in Japan and European countries that have banned guns for the most simple explanation for why we need strict gun laws. We also have issues just facing cold hard facts with who commits crime and why they should be locked up. I don’t want Charles Allen to tread the same ground that’s already been trodden by “examining the root causes of crime so as to develop a holistic approach to fighting it”. The causes are obvious: poverty, homes with one parent, or parents who aren’t around or who even care, etc. there are a million studies that show they root cause of crime. And so, Charles Allen can kowtow to the self-flagellating criminal justice reform folks all he wants. He can waste money on all the “violence interruptors” and spend money on restorative justice, and Youth Rehabilitaton Act, and second chance act and all this other nonsense that is less effective than just tough on crime policing and arrest. [b]The facts are that some families get screwed because their father commit a violent crime or a teen gets locked up for murder[/b]. Or what have you. We need to enforce the law on violent crime. We could legalize other stuff like drugs, but we need to fight violent crime or it’s going to be 1990 all over again and families will leave and the tax base will dry up and it will suck again. [/quote] This lens is just incredible. And I'm not attacking you, PP, because I know the context of the conversation and where this is coming from. But the families that truly, primarily, and innocently get screwed are the the families of the victims. Nevermind the actual victims. Somehow, we've just decided to ignore them. It's like, the crime has occurred and we can't prevent that victimization, so we should focus on providing social support for the criminal and their families. The entire premise is Orwellian.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics