Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]MS Attorney General - the woman who comes from a rich family - stated that the law was great because it empowers women and they can have it all! Any woman can achieve her dreams and have children! Any woman can take care of a small child and she uses her own life as a example. She was divorced with 3 small children and if she can do it, anyone can! Never mind that she had childcare and a nanny. Or that MS is the only state without a gender pay equity law. Or that MS women are the poorest in the nation. She doesn't support paid family leave or subsidized child care. Why would she, she was fine as a single parent. Any her daddy, who is her largest donor, is the owner of a great quail hunting estate, where one of the options for accommodations is to stay in the house of Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Confederate general and the first Ku Klux Klan grand wizard. This is an upstanding family![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
