Reply to I guess you only get to "choose" when you agree with this administration

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "I guess you only get to "choose" when you agree with this administration"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Many insurers don't cover infertility.  So this whole "cover viagra because it enables conception" argument rings false to me.

What I see is a religious willingness to encourage and support male sexuality but a reluctantance to embrace women's sexual freedom.[/quote]

I see no reason why we should pay for either.  One of the PPs claims a range of health benefits for sex.  Well, can I get my health care plan to pay for my blueberries or oatmeal that I understand are great for my health.  What about my gym membership?  Private trainer?  Why not?  The health benefits are pretty much the same.  I am confident that, in evolutionary terms, there is a difference between sex to continue mankind and sex because I want it.  What we have here is that everything, even lifestyle choices, become health related.  An older guy that can't get it up must have a health problem.  Health care costs will never get under control with some of the arguments stated above.  I am far more interested in spending limited resources on a breast cancer victim to ensure her survival than to pay her birth control pills so she can have fun on Saturday night.  Sorry, paying for someone's sex life is not my problem.[/quote]

That's fine.  As long as viagra is treated the same as other sexual health related treatments.  Which it never will be because the drug makers are too powerful a lobby.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics