Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "25 y/o $4M Net Worth-should I go to law school?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=NickScarfo][quote=Anonymous]No. Assume 3-4% growth, not 6-7% to avoid unpleasant surprise (few good investment managers can credibly project 7% going forward)... If I had $$$ BigLaw is the *last* place I’d want to be for 70-80 hrs a week.[/quote] 3-4% for an aggressive portfolio? That sounds awful. My plan doesn't include any fixed income and may eventually incorporate direct investment alternatives along with equities. Even 7% would typically be conservative for long run return on equities. Not sure where your numbers come from...[/quote] P.s. imo you are also wrong not to have any fixed income, I have never gone all in or out in any one sector. I get your mindset, but looking back on my own investing history and how it worked out (and how others’ I know didn’t), I’m suggesting that you take a wider view unless you’re ok with it all going away more readily than might be the case with more diversification and less speculation. PP here ... IMO your approach is wrong. You have way too long an investment horizon to go whipping it out on flyers and hyper aggressive portfolio choices. If you want to have to go back to work when the next crash hits you, by all means do. But my approach saved me 50% of the losses, or more, that others had with aggressive approaches. It’s much harder to make it back after a big dip than it is to avoid biggest dips. It’s your money. My approach got me to retirement early and I make more now than when I worked with no crazy risk.... 3-4% is the new 6% (return assumptions) for every prudent analyst I’ve read. Of course in recent years we’ve done much better but if your benchmark assumptions are too high you set up to fail. :idea: [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics