Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "Evelyn Muhlhan - another homebirth midwife bites the dust?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So, what's a "term" baby? 37 weeks? Under your logic, babies could be allowed to be born at home at 36 weeks and 6 days then? That would make sense? Or would they have the "right" to hospital care at earlier points of gestation? If so, how early are you suggesting we give fetuses these "rights"? Where do you draw the line? Conception? Potential for conception? Oral contraceptives should therefore be illegal because babies have the "right" to potentially be born, but only in hospitals, huh? Again, this is about women's rights. Stripping them of options and making certain things "illegal" because of the opinions (read: pocketbooks) of obstetricians is insane. The woman should be the only decider when it comes to decisions about her reproductive health, whether she wants to give birth with an OB or if she wants her mom to catch the baby in the comfort of her own bedroom. If you start giving "term babies" the "right" to a hospital birth, you're going down a slippery slope.[/quote] CNM here again and I fundamentally disagree. As a CNM attending a birth I have TWO patients: the mother and the child. I believe I have a moral responsibility to that child to be born in a safe manner that gives it the best shot at a meaningful and productive life. What could be more selfish than to saddle a child with a lifetime of disability because of the mother's reckless decisions at the time of delivery? It's almost easier for me to agree that a woman's right to birth as she chooses should trump the right of her fetus to live. It's much harder for me say that her right to birth trumps the right of another human being (her child) to not have a lifetime of disability. Thankfully, much of even the natural birth community agrees with me. And even the fringe that would value the "birth experience" over all other things IN THEORY sings a different tune when they are the client and they are bleeding or their child's heart beat is failing.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics