Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "No more safeties since they now focus on yield protection? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Blah. Blah. If VT was indeed yield protecting (which I don't think it has the resources to do so), how do you explain all the top of the class at xxx HS (e.g. TJHSST) getting in? These children would not go to VT. And yet they were accepted this year. [/quote] The basic problem is that this is not true. My DC (in 2020) had a 4.3+ and 1550+ SAT at TJ and was WLed at VT. That is yield protection. If your kid is unexpectedly WLed at VT and wants to go, I suggest you call VT and say WTF?[/quote] I have noticed most kids waitlisted were the ones who applied RD. VT says apply EA, RD has limited space. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
