Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "“We need to preserve diversity and mitigate the projected whitening of the feeder pattern”"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ward 3 parent here- I have zero problem with the language. In fact, I applaud it. [/quote] Ward 2 parent here whose child is the subject of this discussion: I find it disgusting and odious when anyone talks about "managing" a population based on an immutable characteristic. It's disgusting when white people talk this way about predominantly black schools or neighborhoods. And it's disgusting when DCPS - a taxpayer funded entity - talks this way about white families. It's demeaning and dehumanizing, regardless of which group you are referencing. And this government-produced document clearly supposes that the existence of white people within the feeder pattern are a NEGATIVE characteristic. WTF? I'd be more than happy for my kid's school to set aside 15% for At-Risk kids, and ramp up services to help those kids thrive. No problem there. Let all these kids take classes together, while also providing opportunities for remedial and advanced learning in small group settings. There's so many good ways for kids from different backgrounds to learn from each other. The issue - as always - is over-crowding. DCPS reacts ten years too late to changes and parent pleas. It wants to cram thirty 2nd graders to a classroom. That's a not a conducive learning environment. The problem is that Bowser/DCPS doesn't want to choose between (1) truly At-Risk kids and (2) the upper middle kids who come from nice houses all over DC and take OOB seats. The second category are a key constituency to which every Mayor kowtows. Hell, they are even given special low-digit license plates to flex their constituency. Those high performing, UMC kids MUST go to their neighborhood schools in Petworth, CoHi, Mt Pleasant, Shaw, Bloomingdale, CapHill, NE, Crestwood, Hillcrest, and Brookland if DCPS is going to turn-around and provide a solid education in all eight Wards. But DCPS doesn't want to do that because it doesn't want to make tough choices. It's easier to blame other people for merely existing. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics