Reply to Smart Restart APS- ventilation studies

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "Smart Restart APS- ventilation studies"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You don’t get to publish “your improved data” and then refuse to share it for replication or examination.

This is insane that people are listening to her.

Having lots of numbers and visuals doesn’t make you right. [/quote]

I agree 100%. I didn’t really have an opinion on it until I saw she refused to share her backup and calculations because she didn’t want people to poke holes in her argument. I cannot take her seriously after that. That’s not how any numbers based evaluation works.[/quote]

That thread is a big yikes.[/quote]

Serious smackdown from Frank Bellavia.[/quote]
Now I need to go find this.[/quote]

LOL. He *received* a smackdown. 
[/quote]

That would be the perception of observers who have fallen for the faulty interpretation and manipulation of the FOIA data, yes. The cargo cult of AEM. [/quote]

LOL. A few posters tore apart his first post using data provided from APS.  He acquiesced and said he’d work on it.

Total smack down. 
[/quote]

Ha ha ha! Nothing like that happened. His “acquiescence” was informing the community that APS is paying a consultant for a complex conversion from one unit per minute to a different unit per hour. You know, since people are publicizing f’d up conclusions because they aren’t experts and have no idea what they’re doing.[/quote]

Of course it did. Stop lying. **She** pointed out several inaccuracies or gaps in the data and analysis completed by APS/the consultants. He ultimately agreed with her.

[/quote]

Are we talking about two different FB threads? Because he posted twice, the second post being this:

“APS schools must comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, which follows ASHRAE Standard 62.1 Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. On December 3, 2020, APS received a FOIA request for data, reports and emails between APS and CMTA and any other consultants APS is using to evaluate ventilation in its schools. All data provided in response to this request was in cubic feet per minute, rather than air changes per hour, because ASHRAE Standard 62.1 is based on cubic feet per minute. APS is not required under FOIA to create new data on air changes per hour that it does not already have. However, given the amount of interest in this topic, APS has asked and is paying CMTA to perform the complex conversion from cubic feet per minute to air changes per hour for APS schools and expects to post the conversion on the APS website next week.”

You can stop calling people liars now.[/quote]

Yes. This was what she said was needed. And pointed out that the data currently available to calculate that (air volumes, etc.) was questionable.  :roll:

[/quote]
And APS was already working on it.  Smart Restart had nothing to do with it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics