Reply to Can I afford a 1.8M house?

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "Can I afford a 1.8M house?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The PP who is anti-inheritance does not seem to understand human nature.

One of the main reasons people work hard and thereby contribute to productivity of the economy is to provide for their children.  This may be during their lifetime or after they die.  This is a deeply ingrained instinct in the human race.

If the state overly limits transfer of wealth to children (or to charity as another poster has raised), [b]many people simply would not exert the additional effort and simply rest on their laurels once they had enough money to see themselves comfortably to death.[/b]

Stymieing the energy and productivity of these people in this way would lower the overall productivity of the economy.  The extra money would not go to educate disadvantaged children or provide other government services as PP thinks because there would be no extra money.
[/quote]

I actually think the bolded would be an AMAZING result for society.[/quote]

Why? It deprives society of the efforts of the most innovative and productive among us.[/quote]

Most people begin to lose mental capabilities in their 30s. By your logic, the most innovative and productive, aren't people working late in life to amass millions to pass on to their children. [/quote]

This is patently not true.  Many great contributors to society have had a fair amount of gray hair.  Sorry but your comment is ageist.[/quote]

It is true. Did you even bother to Google it? This is one study. There are many, many others.
[url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2683339/[/url]

You are conflating two issues. Don't get confused.  Older people do contribute greatly to society, despite no longer being at the top of their game.

Similarly, you are conflating wealth with talent, innovation and productivity. This is also wrong.

I recommend you educate yourself before posting. [/quote]

Did you read the article?  Main conclusion: These results, together with similar findings in many other studies, clearly establish the existence of cross-sectional age-related declines for many cognitive variables prior to age 60."  60 is quite far away from 30.  And there are many sort of work where experience far outweighs superior performance on some sort of cognitive test.  Like how to build and maintain a business successfully.[/quote]

I did not read this particular article. I have read others like it.

Again, just because some people are smart at 60 doesn't mean that people don't start to lose their mental abilities in their 30s. You continue to conflate different issues. Why is that?
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics