Reply to SAHM vs WOHM, why the strong feelings

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "SAHM vs WOHM, why the strong feelings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]NP: but the survey talk got me thinking, and I found this great Pew report on the rise of the SAHM
https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/04/08/after-decades-of-decline-a-rise-in-stay-at-home-mothers/

This graph in particular spoke to me on the childcare/SAHM debate above:
https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/04/08/after-decades-of-decline-a-rise-in-stay-at-home-mothers/sdt-2014-04_moms-at-home-3-01/

It finds that WOHM ends up providing only 7 hrs less per week in childcare than the SAHM.  They also provide slightly less housework (8hr less) but have less leisure (9hr less) and less sleep (5hr less).  One could argue, lets assume the the average WOHM outsources 40hr/week in childcare (daycare, nanny, school, etc) plus providing their 11hr/week in childcare - this means there is 51hr/week in childcare that needs to be covered ... now, the SAHM covers 18hr/week in childcare.  And 51hr - 18hr = 33hr.  This is most likely driven by children in school, but that is childcare.  SAHM absolutely receive tens of hours a week in childcare on average.

That isn't for debate.

Now back to preferences, if you are able to afford to live a lifestyle you are comfortable with on one income, i can 100% see how a person can prefer to be a SAHM (9hr more leisure, more time with kids, house chores, and sleep!) but that isn't everyone's preference, or what works for their family.

But let's not pretend SAHM dont outsource childcare too.  Swapped playdates, school, family watching the child on the weekend.  THAT.IS.HELP.WITH.CHILDCARE.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics