Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SDNY"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Deutsche Bank [/quote] Still no one has explained what supposedly nefarious ties to DB Clayton has.[/quote] Not necessarily nefarious but likely a conflict of interest. Clayton counted Deutsche Bank as a client and defended them in a massive Russian money-laundering scandal. “There is a criminal investigation into Deutsche Bank occurring in SDNY,” Stedman said, adding: “Deutsche Bank is Trump's lender.” https://www.ft.com/content/efbc8fd4-99a5-11ea-8b5b-63f7c5c86bef And you should be able to find many articles about Trump and DB. "Donald Trump’s relationship with Deutsche Bank has lasted longer than any of his marriages and is cloaked in more secrecy." https://www.ft.com/content/efbc8fd4-99a5-11ea-8b5b-63f7c5c86bef[/quote] And the easy answer is that he would recuse himself from cases where he has a conflict of interest.[/quote] No one does that in this administration.[/quote] That’s simply not true, generally (e.g., Sessions) or specifically with respect to Clayton. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/conflicts-of-interest-rarely-kept-sec-chairmen-from-voting/ Clayton didn’t vote at a similar rate to Mary Jo White, the prior Obama nominated chair who likewise came from a white shoe law firm.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics