Reply to a solution to the redshirting debate?

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "a solution to the redshirting debate?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not this debate again. Stay in your lane. It is none of your business what parents decide for their children. [/quote]

[/quote]

It is my business if my kid has to compete against someone 13 months older than them.[/quote]

It can be more than 13 months.  My child is a September kid so if someone holds back their March, April, May, June kid, its far more of an age spread than 13 months.[/quote]

Why would anyone do that? A kid born in June is already on the older half. I guess they want their kid to be at-least 7 months older than any other kid. If holding back a child who's already slated to be on the older half doesn't scream greed, I don't know what does.[/quote]

Kids born in June are not in the older half. Even if no one redshirted, the cut off is Sept 30 (Loudoun, Fairfax) or Sept 1 (Moco.) Either way June kids are in the youngest quarter and even more so due to redshirting.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics