Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Residents appeal MCPS boundary changes, challenge legality of diversity focus"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Come on. [b]People are defending their constitutional rights[/b]. Have all of you read the appeal? [/quote] Which constitution grants them the right not to be reassigned to a different school within their school district?[/quote] Did you read the appeal? The United States Supreme Court ruled that racial balancing is unconstitutional, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the [b]United States Constitution[/b].[/quote] Well, it's a darn good thing MCPS didn't engage in racial balancing, then. Rather, they engaged in economic balancing while trying to maximize walkers. [b]This appeal will go nowhere, but the folks involved will be known as anti-integration types for as long as Google exists.[/b] [/quote] They love being on the wrong side of history. [/quote] As long as my child end up on the right side of the ever more competitive job market, I really don't care how you define history, let alone what side of it is wrong. It's your history, so you deal with it. You have a salary, feel free to pay reparations, rent out your basement to drug addicts in vain hopes of reforming them, whatever. People who are here as 1st generation immigrants have no compelling interest in correcting some historical wrong that should have self-corrected generations ago. [/quote] I'm pretty sure that's exactly what George Wallace said![/quote] No, these positions are not equivalent.[/quote] No really that's what he said.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics