Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What do you think of the $55 million settlement in the Johns Hopkins malpractice case?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm having a hard time figuring out which patient the report is talking about. Is she the one who arrived at the hospital fully dilated and not progressing after pushing for hours? If so, I don't understand why they didn't do an immediate c-section even though I doubt that it would have helped the baby. That baby was injured during the home birth, there isn't much doubt about that. I guess the question is, [b]did the hospital compound the injury by not doing the c-section right away?[/b] I would need to understand the medical reasoning for them not doing that. Was the patient refusing the c-section? What was going on? [/quote] In the nurse license suspension certification, it is Complaint #2 and Patient B and Baby B. That is the question, yes. And the hospital is saying that a c-section right away would not have helped Baby B. From what I know of birth injuries, I don't disagree with them, but I'm not an expert or a doctor. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
