Reply to Ruth Bader Ginsburg Misses Court

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Ruth Bader Ginsburg Misses Court"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wonder how she's functioning being so I'll every other week[/quote]

Ok, troll.   Move along.  Go haunt some other board. [/quote]

Shes been out a lot including last week[/quote]

It probably is inconsequential that she's missing work. She probably has something akin to a Mad-Libs book, where there's a pad with _________ blank spaces to fill in for the cases, and under each blank space it says "[b]insert liberal dogma here[/b]", and any of her clerks can just fill it out for her. [/quote]

Funny, and all along I thought it was called “legal precedent” instead.  Silly me.[/quote]

The job of the USSC isn't to apply legal precedent.

It is to decide if legal precedent or laws are Constitutional or not.

Did you not go to high school?

[/quote]

DP.  Within the context of applying S Ct precedent (case law) and the principle of state decisis.  A quick look through any S Ct case will confirm this.  It is your post that is dumb and illiterate beyond human comprehension. [/quote]

Incorrect.

The Supreme Court is charged with making sure prior lower court decisions (especially those with decisions which will be precedent-setting) pass constitutional muster muster. Likewise for new laws that are challenged in the court system.

If the Supreme Court's job was simply to make sure legal precedent was applied, then abortion would still be illegal and gays couldn't be married. Because that was the existing legal precedent, until those cases reached the USSC. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics