Reply to #JustinsTrafficJam

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "#JustinsTrafficJam"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]The term “road diet” is such PR BS.[/b]

“Road Chokehold” is more appropriate.[/quote]

I agree. I prefer "safer streets for everyone."[/quote]

Sanctimonious Street is quite unsafe [/quote]

I'll wait for the actual data. This ain't it.[/quote]

I prefer experience over data.   Data can be manipulated as was done throughout the process.  I experience the delays on both Seminary and Janneys Lane daily.   They were not there before the road diet.  To avoid them, I take Howard to Braddock and Quaker back to Trinity, which is fast becoming a cut through.   Wait until those rich people start complaining.[/quote]

+ infinity. actual experience is the data motherload.  [/quote]

anecdotes are not data. The anecdotes already conflict.  [/quote]

What is the conflicting anecdote?

[/quote]

People I know (both option 3 supporters and neutrals) saying the road is fine almost all the time, even most rush hours.

Did you see the NBC4 piece last night?  With the traffic flowing smoothly in the background as an opponent decried massive traffic jams?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics