Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Peter Strzok and Andy McCabe file wrongful termination lawsuits"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So the Trump Administration is going to indict McCabe for leaking about the Clinton email case. Punishment for then being on the Trump-Russia investigation. Discovery will be interesting.[/quote] More accurately - punishment for misleading statements, aka, lying. So, you think it's fine for Mueller's team to charge people for misleading statements, but if McCabe does it, NBD? [quote]U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu has recommended moving forward with charges against Andrew McCabe, Fox News has learned, as the Justice Department rejects a last-ditch appeal from the former top FBI official. McCabe -- the former deputy and acting director of the FBI -- appealed the decision of the U.S. attorney for Washington all the way up to Jeffrey Rosen, the deputy attorney general, but he rejected that request, according to a person familiar with the situation. The potential charges relate to DOJ inspector general findings against him regarding misleading statements concerning a Hillary Clinton-related investigation. A source close to McCabe’s legal team said they received an email from the Department of Justice which said, "The Department rejected your appeal of the United States Attorney’s Office’s decision in this matter. Any further inquiries should be directed to the United States Attorney’s Office."[/quote] https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-attorney-recommends-proceeding-with-charges-against-mccabe-as-doj-rejects-last-ditch-appeal[/quote] Is this the [b]same report that recommended firing him[/b] but, since he'd already retired, recommended letting it go? But then Sessions fired him anyway? That report? There weren't any recommendations for charging him in that report. [/quote] Actually, I don't even remember. Did it recommend firing, reprimanding, what? But since he had already retired, the report basically just shrugged. Sessions took it upon himself, apparently at Trump's behest, to fire him. Now this? It's just nuts. And if the law works like it should, he'll win his wrongful termination lawsuit.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics