Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Costco shooter was a cop... and all 3 victims were unarmed"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). Police use of force judged by objective reasonableness standard as compared to police, not non-police. Police are always technically on duty. Always have arrest powers. Never have to retreat if they can articulate why they reasonably believed why a violation of law was taking place, even if that was not actually the case. Firearm carried pursuant to office, not LEOSA. Cop will seek refuge in police status. Bad shooting? Probably. But until all the facts are in, nobody knows. But like it or not, police are held to a lower standard in the use of force, and study how to articulate their rationale for using it. [/quote] that says zero about a shooting committed while off duty in the name of self-defense. [/quote] also, it's a civil tort case, not a criminal case. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
