Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Say NO to Bowser on changing building height limits"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The only way to bring housing costs down is to build more densely. That means building higher. Shrug. It’s the only option. We have to build higher.[/quote] No developer is going to build tall affordable housing. Ask the folks in New York and San Francisco how that theory is planning out. In fact, by tearing down older class B and C apartment buildings in Upper NW which have a lot of rent controlled units to build luxury buildings, the stock of affordable housing will be reduced.[/quote] A. There are already inclusionary zoning requirements on new developments, so yeah, there is tall AH B. If you want to you could make specific AH requirements as a condition of building above the old height limit C. Adding total supply of even luxury new units, will draw people who might otherwise have gentrified a poor or transitional neighborhood. D. If you want specific protections for older rent controlled units, you can add those. Or only allow more height on specified parcels that do not have existing apts. [/quote] Let's let certain buildings exceed the height limit by a modest margin only if they are rent controlled housing.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics