Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Tulsi Gabbard 2020"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I've not seen one supported "fact" or reasonable opinion on this thread to support the vitriol I'm seeing directed toward her here. I see a lot of blathering. Lots of blathering. But nothing of substance.[/quote] She openly sided with Putin’s darling against U.S. interests, and, no matter what her current position is, she said absurdly, insanely hateful things about gay people. What other facts do we need?[/quote] How is civil war in Syria in the US interests? serious question. [/quote] In my opinion: Putin was at least temporarily right about Syria, in a depressing way. The United States hasn’t benefited from civil war in Syria. In Syria: in the long run, the United States has a stake in easing Assad out and judging Syria toward being less repressive. In the short run, the United States and Russia both had a shared interest in Syria beings place where children can live in houses and grow up to be adults. But the United States has an interest in Poland and Scandinavia having self-determination, in Alaska continuing to be a U.S. state, and in submarine-launched missiles not wiping out the cities on the coasts. We can’t have another president who puts Poland on a plate and asks Putin if he wants that with whipped cream or with sprinkles. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics