Reply to MCPs county wide boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "MCPs county wide boundary study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]B-CC itself doesn't have serious overcrowding after the expansion but does seem to be at the nexus of many schools that either are or have the capacity so will probably be part of any solution. Nevertheless, I wouldn't get worked up over it. [/quote]

By the time Woodward opens, B-CC is projected to be overcapacity again. But, as has been already stated, B-CC's chapter in the CIP makes no mention of Woodward.[/quote]

Would you mention this? Seriously just the rumor of minor changes to a school's bounary makes parents go bananas.[/quote]

True. But the point is Woodward *is* mentioned in the WJ and DCC chapters.[/quote]

Right. The CIP includes a discussion of Woodward for the following chapters:

1. WJ
2. DCC

The CIP does NOT include a discussion for the following chapters:

1. all of the other clusters (including B-CC)

So why does that one poster keep insisting that the Woodward rezoning will include B-CC? I don't know.[/quote]

Not that poster but probably because they invited reps from BCC to the first discussions about the new high school if I recall correctly.  I believe in these sam3 meetings proposals about bcc using office space was discussed [/quote]

The CIP discusses overcrowding and expansion projects at several MCPS schools. These projects by themselves aren't sufficient to manage the overcrowding without changes to existing boundaries. B-CC is one school sandwiched between a school with capacity and several that lack it. It is likely part of any solution to these problems whether parents like it or not.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics