Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "MCPS curriculum RFP-Second Attempt"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Please share this with any good curriculum providers :-) http://procurement.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/home/Bid_Record/1638 [/quote] +1[/quote] thx, I read the RFP file (last one listed) and am familiar with legal docs. no mention of[b] science or social studies[/b] in either ELA or math requirements or preferences. Guess MCPS will whip that up? mentioned 45-60 minutes of daily ELA and of daily Math so that frees up 60 minutes versus current C2.0. Wonder what MCSP will do with that time? More gym, A day for science, B day for social studies? no mention of physical textbooks or work books, just digital stuff for teachers, parents, students. [/quote] science and social studies were never in scope of the RFP. It has always been ELA and math..[/quote] C2.0 "wove in Science and SS". Now we're out bidding for math and ELA only, to replace the C2.0 math and ela that contained whatever science and SS mcps had. So what does that leave for science and SS? That is the question, and it's not a RFP question. It's what is MCPS going to do for science and SS K-5??[/quote] No clue. Over in the Jack Smith thread, [b]some are claiming science and ss are peachy keen in 2.0.[/b] I wonder what they think will happen now that we’re supposedly getting dedicated math and ELA curricula.[/quote] You know that people on that thread can read this thread, too, right? That is such an awful misstatement of what people are claiming on that thread. You have the doom and gloom people saying that schools don't cover science / social science because there is no dedicated time slot. Others are saying that their children are learning science despite lack of dedicated time slots. Quite different than your peachy keen description here. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics