Reply to 2017-2018 PARCC results

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "2017-2018 PARCC results "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

That said, L-T's turn around is amazing. Despite what an early poster said about richer/whiter =ing better test scores (obviously true), L-T's scores have shot up despite the fact that they still have large non-white/non-rich populations. L-T was still Title I last year. It can report at-risk and special education scores. It is richer and whiter than it was, yes... but it's still not that white or that rich and it's scores are climbing. In fact, it's white kids scores are on par with JKLM by and large. The fact that over 50% of AT RISK students tested 4s or 5s in English is especially notable and a real achievement. [b]Is there any other DCPS that can boast that?[/b][/quote]

[b]DCPS Schools with significant numbers of at-risk students scoring 4+[/b]

Hyde Addison: 57% of at-risk students 4+ in ELA; 53% in math  (11.5% at risk school wide, not necessarily in testing grade)

Eaton: 42%/42% (5% at risk percentage at school)

Ketchum: 20%/46% (81% at-risk)

Deal: 35%/22% (6% at risk)

Banneker: 88%/59% (19% at risk)

Shepherd: 22%/48% (13% at risk)

Hearst: 40%/40% (6% at risk)

HD Cooke: 26%/43% (43% at risk)

Marie Reed: 40/32 (31% at risk)

Maury: 41/36 (7% at risk)

McKinley Tech: 79/13 (35% at risk)

Oyster Adams 41/33 (10% at risk)

SWW HS 69/36 (10% at risk)

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics