Reply to Is Stanford the "gold standard?"

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Is Stanford the "gold standard?""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]According to the Stanford Daily, Jeff Raikes, alumni Chair of the Stanford University Board of Trustees in a presentation to the Board, stated that alums of the past five to 10 years have rated their Stanford experience lower than those of earlier years and suggested that the Board needs to improve its relationship with the student body. So no, Stanford is definitely not the gold standard in undergraduate education. [/quote]
[/b]
Thank you for this information.[/quote]

This was the experience of a family member who just graduated.  The parents (double legacies) would never redo it.  Their white daughter was made to feel so inferior due to SJWarriors on campus that she left with no self-pride. She was made to feel inferior due to her white privilege.[/quote]

You can look at this a couple of ways.  As for the "Gold Standard" for prestige, I'd still name Harvard first overall in the U.S. and MIT is there for technical fields.  Stanford is very close.  As for the "Gold Standard" for actual educational experience, it might not be any one of these.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics