Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Pets
Reply to "United forces woman to put puppy in overhead bid, where it dies during flight"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t understand why having the infant meant that she could not check on the dog. Since the dog was making noise, surely she could have asked somebody for help with holding the baby while she checked on the dog. I also don’t understand how they were allowed to bring the carrier onto the plane, but then it did not fit under the seat. The solution would be to put the other bags in the overhead compartment or check the other bags, not cram the dog up into the overhead compartment, for Pete’s sake. [/quote] They paid the dog fee so tyipcally the carrier is measured at check-in to ensure it fits under the seat. I wonder if they were in a bulkhead row with no under-seat storage -- though people with a pet are not supposed to be booked into bulkhead or exit row for that reason. Airline's fault -- can't expect the passenger to know all these particular rules (or even what a bulkhead is).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
