Reply to "we can't have laws because criminals will just break them"

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to ""we can't have laws because criminals will just break them""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]you people arguing for the status quo sound insane. moreover, you sound like losers who are going to find themselves out of office as soon as these kids come of age.

but please, by all means, keep on shouting. keep on being unreasonable. keep on not listening.

your assh*le in chief goes to nightclubs while kids go to funerals. [b]you've read about marie antoinette, i assume?[/b][/quote]
I don't get the reference, or the meaning.[/quote]

There is an out of touch government that is focused on its own comfort and pleasure, and this will be its downfall. I thought the reference was pretty clear.
[/quote]
When I looked at Hillary, I saw someone who could walk on kittens to keep her shoes from getting muddy. Her whole campaign was "I'm with Her."  Yeah, that's great. Trump's was making [i]America[/i] great, not having people worship him. And since he's been in office that's what he's been doing, putting ordinary Americans first instead of taking orders from Citibank:
https://newrepublic.com/article/137798/important-wikileaks-revelation-isnt-hillary-clinton

Trump isn't out of touch, you are. You can't understand why there are 400 million guns in this country. It's unfathomable to you. Or why people voted for a guy who said he was going to put them first. That's out of touch.[/quote]

Okey doke. Well I guess we'll see whose interpretation of the current situation is right, in November![/quote]
I guess we will.  Tom Perez seems more interested in teaching teens new curse words than winning elections though.  And not a single Democrat voted for those bumps in everyones' paychecks that people seem to like so much (what Nancy Pelosi keeps calling "crumbs"). In fact, they're talking about how much they want to undo them.  Again, out of touch.

I watched the 2016 election live. I saw how Hillary had a 98.1% chance of winning on election day. In case you forgot:
https://twitter.com/HuffPost/status/795663593689808896

You believe your polls. Heck, even extrapolate a few special elections. My take, you have a 98.1% chance of being right.[/quote]

My take: you and your pussy grabbing president are going to see like pathetic historical relics before too long.

IDGAF if you agree with me or want to keep hurling insults at me and every other women who comes before you. In fact, I'd rather you keep talking, because I think it is a good reminder to everyone just how disgusting Trump lovers are and how much we need to get out the vote to make sure you aren't the ones in charge anymore.[/quote]
He'll be impeached any day now.  Unless Jill Stein has another recount, or the "faithless electors" prevent him from getting enough electoral college votes. Or maybe they'll show how he really, truly "colluded" (which isn't a crime btw - ask Hillary) with Russia.  Trump and his cronies are working on borrowed time.  They'll be out any day now. Just like CNN's year-long MH370 coverage was totally effective at finding it, and not about getting the rubes to keep tuning in.

[/quote]

Since you seem to be bothered by “collusion,” we can all agree that the proper term is conspiracy. Conspiracy to launder money. Conspiracy to violate campaign finance laws.  Conspiracy to violate the Hatch Act.  Conspiracy to obstruct justice.  [/quote]
This time they'll get him!  Any day now![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics