Reply to If you have been a biglaw partner for 10+ years, how much wealth have you accumulated?

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "If you have been a biglaw partner for 10+ years, how much wealth have you accumulated?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's hard to stack coins until the line between oppressor and oppressed is crossed. Depending on the individual, that doesn't happen until late 40s (for those who went straight through) or 50s or later (for those who took a more circuitous route, such as spending a lot of time in government). Only senior partners, esp big rainmakers, make a lot more than they bring in. Many relationships are institutional, and only are inherited late in one's career.  Biglaw is not a path to great riches.  Don't get me wrong, it's plenty comfortable.[b] But only a small handful get to one percent wealth (currently around $12m in net worth) through law[/b].[/quote]

This.  It can be a good life, but not big money.  Every law firm partner I know doesn’t want their kid to go into law.[/quote]

Perhaps but I still think that biglaw is one of the best risk adjusted careers if financial success is the goal.  We can all decide whether financial success is the right goal but let's compare biglaw to investment banking.  Certainly a decade or two ago investment banking would have hands-down been the right career path to make a lot of money.  These days a lot of bulge bracket Managing Directors are probably in the $1m-$3m range.  However, the career risk they have is much greater than in biglaw.  Biglaw firms while increasingly cut throat still doesn't compare to investment banking--most MD's careers are over by 50.  If you're over 50 in investment banking you either made it to the very top (think top management of a major investment bank) or you've been pushed out working at a boutique where it's completely eat what you kill.

The chance of making MD is no better than making partner (perhaps worse), the time you get to stay MD vs stay partner is much worse, and then the market cycle driven layoffs are more intense than in law.  A good typical biglaw partner can practice well into his/her 50s perhaps 60s and then collect on a pension payout for years.  So the bankers might make a little more as associates, VPs, directors (% wise bigger difference but compared to making partner in biglaw or MD in investment banking the cumulative differences are probably not much more than a year or two of comp for an MD/partner), make MD in their mid 30s (perhaps a couple years earlier) and then flame out typically within 10 years or less.[/quote]

Seems hard to believe.  Would you rather be a senior banker at Goldman Sachs or a senior partner at Skadden, Cravath, etc?  Do others really believe this?[/quote]

I know, I thought that was weird too.

In terms of wealth, you're talking 10-20M (law) vs. 100 millions (GS).[/quote]

How do you get to 100 millions at GS?  Those were either pre-IPO partners.  I don't think anyone at GS can get to 100s of millions unless you are senior management (i.e. top 10 perhaps).  Your run of the mill Managing Director doesn't stand a chance.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics